<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: customer service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2007/03/23/customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2007/03/23/customer-service/</link>
	<description>Just another Janesguide.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2007/03/23/customer-service/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2007/03/23/customer-service/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;hey said in no uncertain terms that the first thing they’d do was can the sextoy reviews, because “men would be turned off by those.”

Do you think that’s true?&lt;/i&gt;

Of the general lad-mag reading populace, when they're picking up something lad-maggy, maybe.

And certainly, there are plenty of men (and women) for whom that is the case: I've certainly heard far more than one tale of woe from women about this over the years.

But as a broad generalization?

Eh.  Personally, I think that a generalization about men from the likes of a lad mag publisher is one you can safely take with a very large grain of salt, especially since their concern is hardly with healthy male sexuality or sexual evolution, and more with keeping their readers feeling utterly unchallenged so they can make the big bucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>hey said in no uncertain terms that the first thing they’d do was can the sextoy reviews, because “men would be turned off by those.”</p>
<p>Do you think that’s true?</i></p>
<p>Of the general lad-mag reading populace, when they&#8217;re picking up something lad-maggy, maybe.</p>
<p>And certainly, there are plenty of men (and women) for whom that is the case: I&#8217;ve certainly heard far more than one tale of woe from women about this over the years.</p>
<p>But as a broad generalization?</p>
<p>Eh.  Personally, I think that a generalization about men from the likes of a lad mag publisher is one you can safely take with a very large grain of salt, especially since their concern is hardly with healthy male sexuality or sexual evolution, and more with keeping their readers feeling utterly unchallenged so they can make the big bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
