Comments on: 26 February 2010

By: Cindy

Cindy — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:42:57 +0000

Oh don’t get me wrong I’m in full agreement you can’t use the term” sex addict” as an excuse, nor should the term apply to anyone that isn’t confined to a mental ward for being a serial masturbater lol. I would have loved to been in that back seat of woods truck when she bitch-slapped the wanker for cheating, pay-per-view event to be sure.

By: jane

jane — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:28:33 +0000

I don’t know that I do think they bear any greater scrutiny than the rest of us. Sure, if someone in a position of power over someone else is using that for non-consensual activity that is one thing, and it’s criminal. Again, with Sheen, beating someone is a crime. I don’t put consensual activity in the same category, and I don’t think “cheating” is excused by way of “sex addiction”.

By: Cindy

Cindy — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:20:28 +0000

Surely you’d have to admit the fine examples the media classify as “sex addicts” do bear scrutiny at least for their nefarious motives or abusive antics captured live on national television for all to see. Nasty Charlie Sheen the wife beater …int he a peach? or that fine hunny that nailed Tiger Woods & David Boranz for fun & profit, or perhaps our famous ex pres blowjob Billy Clinton that used the power of the white house to get laid? Like Tiger Woods using the power of his celebrity to get a little trim on the side,over & over & over till it became an issue? There has to be a difference between sex for fun at home and abuse of power in that regard don’t you think? Is it an addiction or media hype that drives this issue, or the disdain well earned by stupid pet trick antics they get caught up in.