<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 March 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/</link>
	<description>Just another Janesguide.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:36:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/?p=401#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>I think you need at least one more category of Adult Blogs; possibly just &quot;Adult Blogs&quot; with no descriptor or &quot;Adult Blogs: General&quot;.  

Trouble is, I can&#039;t see how to cram my blog, or Violet Blue&#039;s, or AAG&#039;s, into any of these existing categories.  AAG might be predominantly personal, but at times she&#039;s done a lot of reviews and some pictures; Violet Blue does more pictures than what I think of as a personal blog but puts more of herself into her blog than I do; and my blog isn&#039;t very personal at all, but in addition to pictures covers adult topics of all sorts without being very personal.  It feels to me like you&#039;ve got some of the specialized subcategories that are out there, but nothing appropriate for blogs that aren&#039;t specialized.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need at least one more category of Adult Blogs; possibly just &#8220;Adult Blogs&#8221; with no descriptor or &#8220;Adult Blogs: General&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Trouble is, I can&#8217;t see how to cram my blog, or Violet Blue&#8217;s, or AAG&#8217;s, into any of these existing categories.  AAG might be predominantly personal, but at times she&#8217;s done a lot of reviews and some pictures; Violet Blue does more pictures than what I think of as a personal blog but puts more of herself into her blog than I do; and my blog isn&#8217;t very personal at all, but in addition to pictures covers adult topics of all sorts without being very personal.  It feels to me like you&#8217;ve got some of the specialized subcategories that are out there, but nothing appropriate for blogs that aren&#8217;t specialized.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1594</link>
		<dc:creator>S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/?p=401#comment-1594</guid>
		<description>Yes, trans &amp; genderqueer categories under written word, please, if there are enough appropriate links.

You could add more fetish categories of course: braces, for example. (I suspect that braces fetish tends to overlap with &quot;legal teen,&quot; which could be a subcategory, or a set of subcategories, under &quot;mainstream&quot; images, if you want to make one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, trans &amp; genderqueer categories under written word, please, if there are enough appropriate links.</p>
<p>You could add more fetish categories of course: braces, for example. (I suspect that braces fetish tends to overlap with &#8220;legal teen,&#8221; which could be a subcategory, or a set of subcategories, under &#8220;mainstream&#8221; images, if you want to make one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/?p=401#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>hi Kev,

actually, I suppose I wouldn&#039;t. When I think &quot;milf&quot; and how it&#039;s portrayed, I think of late twenties, low thirties. I suppose I&#039;ll add a separate category. 

and let me not even get started about terms like &quot;cougar&quot; and &quot;milf&quot;, that&#039;s a whole blog entry to itself. heh. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Kev,</p>
<p>actually, I suppose I wouldn&#8217;t. When I think &#8220;milf&#8221; and how it&#8217;s portrayed, I think of late twenties, low thirties. I suppose I&#8217;ll add a separate category. </p>
<p>and let me not even get started about terms like &#8220;cougar&#8221; and &#8220;milf&#8221;, that&#8217;s a whole blog entry to itself. heh. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/?p=401#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>Are you including the milf&#039;s under the mature category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you including the milf&#8217;s under the mature category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyra Saunders</title>
		<link>http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/2010/03/07/7-march-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyra Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janesguide.com/wpmu/janesays/?p=401#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>The only thing I though of off the top of my head is maybe a Transexual category under the Written Word. The rest all made sense to me and seem really comprehensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I though of off the top of my head is maybe a Transexual category under the Written Word. The rest all made sense to me and seem really comprehensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
